back to lab

AI as a visual assistant

using ai in the workflow without replacing the eye

a blue editorial frame, abstract suggestion of machine vision and light
tools that stay out of the frame

Where machine vision earns its place in editorial work, and where it ought to stay out of the room.

The honest answer is: the AI never picks the frame. Selection, tone, the decision of what the photograph is about — those stay with the photographer. Anything else is just process.

where it helps

Culling. The first pass through 600 frames is mechanical: out-of-focus, eyes-closed, exposure errors. A vision model handles that in twenty seconds and gets it right almost every time. The hour I get back goes into looking longer at the remaining 60.

Captioning. For internal archives only — a draft alt-text the photographer rewrites, never a final publication.

Search. "Find the frame with the red coat near a window." That used to be twenty minutes of scrolling.

where it does not belong

Composition advice. Tone curves. Anything described as "enhancement". A model that has been trained on the average internet photograph will always optimise toward the average internet photograph. That is the opposite of editorial work.

a note on local

Everything above runs on the workstation, not in someone else's cloud. The photographs are the client's. The model can be ignorant of that and still be useful.